- Decision Boards
- Research Clusters
- Joint Seminars
- Testbed & Simulation
- Summer School
- Visitor Programme
- In the News
- News Archive
Two COOJA plugins and manuals have been published to integrate the TWIST testbed in COOJA and to take checkpoints and perform rollbacks both in TWIST and COOJA.
The 4th International Workshop on Networks of Cooperating Objects for Smart Cities 2013 (CONET/UBICITEC 2013), colocated with CPSWeek 2013, accepts submissions until January 28th, 2013.
The 19th CONET newsletter has been published. You can read on Virtual Organizations for Multi-Model Based Embedded Systems and on the UvA Bird Tracking System.
The primary goal of the CTF is to enable convenient access to the resources of multiple CO testbeds, when organized in a loose federation of testbeds. The CTF platform provides an abstraction over the federation members and offers additional APIs that operate in the context of the federation aggregate in order to support the experimenters during the full experiment life-cycle.
In the design of the platform we have followed a set of guiding principles:
Although it shares some common characteristic with other testbed federation frameworks, the proposed CTF platform is carefully tuned to the specific needs of the CO testbeds. This specialization has enabled us to leave out some complex features that are not applicable or not important for the target domain, at the same time giving us opportunity to focus on the more important aspects like the impact of the wireless communication on the resource allocation problem, or the inclusion of tester controlled SUT mobility.
In contrast to many other testbed federation frameworks that take an institution centric approach, our platform puts the individual user in the center of the design. It decouples service levels and policies from the question whether a particular user belongs to a federation member institution or not. All aspects of the service should be configurable and controllable at the granularity of a single user. This design principle, for example, has direct implications on the architecture of the AAA abstractions and has significant impact on the openness of the platform.
A typical CO testbed is a large heterogeneous distributed system which makes the task of integrating several such systems behind a common federation platform particularly challenging. Addressing these challenges requires careful engineering that leverages the best-practices learned from other successful large distributed systems, like the Web. High scalability of the solution has to be maintained by promoting stateless interactions and using caching whenever possible.
To be successful, the CTF platform has to be kept as simple as possible, but also modular and extensible, so new features and capabilities can be organically added when they are needed. In contrast to many other testbed federation frameworks, an explicit goal of the CTF platform is the openness towards external service providers. The same APIs that are used internally to build the higher-level federation services will be also made available to external entities to promote integration with their services.
By focusing on a set of common, testbed-independent APIs, the CTF platform will necessarily lack some specific services of the individual testbeds that are valuable to the end-users. Thus, it is crucial to enable parallel use of the native interfaces of the member testbeds and the federation APIs. The CTF platform should not limit the autonomy of the members of the federation by imposing only a single access-path to the resources of the individual testbeds.
The usage of the CTF platform should not impose unnecessary constraints on the development process on the user side. In particular, the platform should be accessible using various programming languages and the users should have freedom in selecting the level of abstraction overhead. This should be achieved by offering a basic, language-agnostic set of API, that enables building client-side solutions for raising the level of abstraction.